Rate Limiting in System Design

Rate limiting is a crucial strategy used to control the number of requests a client or user can make to a system in a given time. It helps protect services from being overwhelmed by high traffic, malicious users, or unintended abuse. Without rate limiting, systems can experience performance degradation, security vulnerabilities, or even complete outages due to traffic spikes.
When and why to use rate limiting? Rate limiting is essential in scenarios where system resources must be protected from abuse, overuse, or misuse. Here are some common situations where rate limiting is applied:
Preventing API Abuse: In public APIs, users can overload a system with too many requests, potentially harming the service and other users.
Controlling Traffic Flow: For any service that handles requests, whether it's an API, website, or microservice, rate limiting ensures smooth traffic flow and prevents performance degradation.
Preventing Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks: By limiting the number of requests from a specific IP or user, you can mitigate DoS attacks that aim to exhaust your resources.
Fair Usage: Rate limiting ensures that no single user or client consumes disproportionate resources, making the service fair for everyone.
Rate Limiting Algorithms When designing a system to handle requests, you need to control how many requests a user can make within a specific time period. This is where rate limiting algorithms come into play. In this section, we’ll dive deeper into four commonly used rate limiting algorithms: Fixed Window, Sliding Window, Leaky Bucket, and Token Bucket. Each of these algorithms has a different way of controlling traffic, and we'll explain how they work with examples to make them easy to understand.
Fixed Window Algorithm How It Works:
The Fixed Window algorithm tracks requests based on a set, fixed time window (e.g., every minute). During each window, the system counts the number of requests a user makes.
If the user exceeds the set limit within that time window, the system rejects any further requests until the next time window begins.


Example:
Suppose you allow a user to make 100 API requests per minute. During the 60 seconds of that minute, the system counts how many requests the user makes:
If the user sends 50 requests, they are allowed to make 50 more within that minute.
If the user hits 100 requests before the minute is over, further requests are denied until the next minute begins.


Limitations:
Traffic Spikes: This algorithm doesn’t handle traffic spikes well. For example, if a user sends 100 requests at the end of one minute and 100 more at the beginning of the next, the system gets hit with 200 requests almost instantly.

  
Use Case:
Fixed Window rate limiting is useful when you expect a steady flow of traffic and don’t need to worry about traffic bursts or spikes.
Sliding Window Algorithm How It Works:
The Sliding Window algorithm improves on the Fixed Window by using a rolling time window. Instead of resetting at the start of every fixed time window, the system keeps track of the requests over a sliding time period.
It continuously checks how many requests have been made over the last X seconds, allowing for a more granular and even distribution of requests.


Example:
Imagine you want to limit a user to 100 requests per minute, but instead of resetting every 60 seconds, you calculate the rate over the last minute at any point in time:
A user sends 50 requests over the first 30 seconds and another 50 in the next 20 seconds. They are still allowed to send more requests because they haven’t exceeded the 100-request limit over the rolling 60-second period.
However, if they try to send more requests, the system denies them until their oldest requests move out of the 60-second window.


Advantages:
Smoother Rate Limiting: This method helps prevent sudden traffic bursts and offers a smoother rate-limiting experience, as users can't make all their requests at the end of one window and the beginning of the next.


Use Case:
Sliding Window is ideal for systems that need to handle bursty traffic more gracefully, ensuring requests are spread out more evenly over time.
Leaky Bucket Algorithm How It Works:
The Leaky Bucket algorithm processes requests at a constant rate, similar to water dripping from a bucket with a small hole. The bucket fills with incoming requests, and they are processed (leaked) at a steady rate.
If the bucket is full (i.e., if the system has too many incoming requests), new requests are either queued or dropped (rejected) depending on system configuration.


Example:
Imagine a system that allows processing of 10 requests per second. As requests come in, they are placed in a bucket:
If there are fewer than 10 requests, they are processed immediately.
If there are more than 10 requests, some of them wait in the queue (bucket) until there’s room to process them.
If the bucket overflows, new requests are discarded (rejected) until space opens up.


Advantages:
Smooth Processing: The steady processing rate ensures that the system doesn’t get overwhelmed by traffic spikes.


Limitations:
Fixed Rate: If the system can process only at a fixed rate, it might not adapt well to sudden traffic bursts where some requests may need immediate attention.


Use Case:
The Leaky Bucket algorithm is great for ensuring a smooth, predictable request flow while controlling overflow efficiently.
Token Bucket Algorithm How It Works:
The Token Bucket algorithm allows for more flexibility than the Leaky Bucket algorithm. Tokens are added to the bucket at a fixed rate, and each incoming request consumes a token. If no tokens are available, the request is denied.
The key advantage of this algorithm is that it allows bursts of traffic by saving up tokens when no requests are made. Once a burst happens, tokens are used up quickly, and the system limits further requests until more tokens are added.


Example:
A user can make up to 10 requests per second, but if they make no requests for 10 seconds, they "save up" tokens:
If they send 50 requests in one second after not using the system for a while, the tokens accumulated over those 10 seconds (10 tokens per second) allow them to make 50 requests at once.
After that, requests are limited to 10 per second again as tokens are added back gradually.


Advantages:
Allows Burst Traffic: It provides flexibility by allowing for bursts of traffic while still enforcing an overall rate limit.
Flexible Use: Users can use more resources when needed (i.e., in bursts) without violating the overall rate.


Use Case:
Token Bucket is widely used for APIs and services that need to allow occasional bursts of requests but still enforce rate limits over a longer period of time.
Implementing Rate Limiting in Different Scenarios Rate limiting is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Depending on your use case—whether you’re protecting an API, managing traffic to a website, or ensuring fair usage across a distributed system—rate limiting needs to be tailored to fit the specific needs of the system. Below, we’ll dive into how rate limiting can be applied in different scenarios, providing examples and clear explanations for each.
API Rate Limiting How does rate limiting apply to APIs?
APIs are one of the most common places where rate limiting is applied. When building a public-facing API, you want to ensure that users don’t abuse your service by sending too many requests in a short period. This could lead to system overloads, degraded performance, or even downtime for legitimate users.


Example:
Let’s say you have a public API for a weather service. You want to limit each user to 1,000 requests per day. Without rate limiting, a single user could monopolize your resources, making it difficult for others to use the service.


Here’s how API rate limiting helps:
Fair Usage: By limiting each user to 1,000 requests per day, you ensure that no one user can hog the system's resources.
Security: Rate limiting helps protect against Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, where a malicious user tries to overload the system by flooding it with requests.
Cost Control: If your API is metered or has costs associated with traffic (e.g., cloud usage fees), rate limiting helps keep costs predictable and manageable.


How It Works:
When a user sends an API request, the system checks how many requests they’ve made in the past 24 hours.
If they’ve made fewer than 1,000 requests, their request is allowed.
If they’ve exceeded the limit, the system responds with an HTTP 429 Too Many Requests error, letting them know they’ve hit their daily limit.


Implementation:
A common way to implement API rate limiting is to store user request counts in a Redis database. Redis is fast, in-memory, and supports counters, making it ideal for tracking API usage in real-time. Each user’s request count is stored in Redis and is reset after the 24-hour window passes.
Web Service Rate Limiting Why is rate limiting important for web services?
For websites or web applications, rate limiting is used to control how many requests a user or visitor can make in a specific period. This is essential for managing spikes in traffic, preventing abuse (like bots or web scrapers), and ensuring a good user experience.
Example:
Imagine an e-commerce site that allows users to search for products. During a high-traffic event like a Black Friday sale, users might search for products at a higher rate, leading to a flood of search requests.
Without rate limiting:
Overloaded Servers: The web server might get overwhelmed by the sheer number of search requests, causing slow page load times or even downtime.
Unfair Usage: Some users (or bots) could send an excessive number of search queries, monopolizing the site’s resources and preventing others from accessing it.
With rate limiting:
Request Limits: You can limit users to 5 searches per second. Once they reach this limit, any further searches will be rejected until the next second starts.
User-Friendly Responses: When users hit the rate limit, they can be shown a friendly message like, “You’ve reached the search limit. Please wait a moment before trying again.”


Implementation:
You can store rate-limiting data (like search queries) in a session or cookie if you’re limiting based on a user’s session. For more sophisticated rate limiting (like tracking user IP addresses), you can use an in-memory database like Redis to maintain the state of how many requests each user has made.
Distributed Systems Rate Limiting How does rate limiting work in distributed systems?
In distributed systems—where multiple servers or instances handle requests—rate limiting becomes more complex because you need to enforce the limit across multiple nodes. This requires coordination to ensure that no single server allows a user to bypass the limit.


Example:
Consider a global API that serves users from multiple regions. You might have servers located in the US, Europe, and Asia. Each user request is routed to the closest server for faster response times. However, the user should be subject to the same rate limit regardless of which server processes their request.
Without a centralized rate limiting mechanism:
A user might be able to bypass the limit by sending requests to different servers (e.g., 1,000 requests to the US server and 1,000 requests to the Europe server).
With a distributed rate-limiting system:
All servers share a centralized store (like Redis or a distributed database) where request counts are tracked.
This way, if a user hits their limit of 1,000 requests, it doesn’t matter which server they hit—the limit is enforced consistently.


Implementation:
To achieve this, you can use a distributed cache (such as Redis, Memcached, or DynamoDB) to track request counts across all servers. Each server checks the centralized store before processing a request to ensure the rate limit hasn’t been exceeded.


Challenges:
Latency: Communicating with a centralized store can introduce latency, especially if your servers are globally distributed. Solutions like geo-replicated caches (e.g., Redis with cross-region replication) can help reduce this latency.
Consistency: In distributed systems, there’s always a trade-off between consistency and availability (as explained by the CAP Theorem). For rate limiting, you may need to ensure that the centralized store remains strongly consistent to prevent users from bypassing limits.
Burst Handling in Rate Limiting What happens when traffic spikes or bursts?
In some scenarios, users might generate a sudden burst of traffic, and you may not want to block all their requests immediately. This is where burst handling comes into play. Burst traffic refers to short periods where a user sends a higher number of requests than usual.


Example:
Consider a mobile app that periodically syncs data with a backend server. Users might not send any requests for hours, but when the sync happens, they might send 20 requests in a matter of seconds. Blocking all these requests would lead to a poor user experience.
To handle burst traffic gracefully, you can use the Token Bucket algorithm. It allows a burst of requests to be processed, while still enforcing an overall rate limit over time.


How It Works:
The user’s token bucket fills up over time. If the bucket accumulates enough tokens, they can make a burst of requests in quick succession.
Once the bucket is empty, requests are processed at a slower rate, ensuring that the user doesn’t exceed the long-term rate limit.
Throttling vs. Rate Limiting What’s the difference between throttling and rate limiting?
While rate limiting refers to setting a hard limit on the number of requests a user can make, throttling is a slightly different approach. Throttling controls the rate at which requests are processed, rather than outright blocking requests.


Example:
In an API, instead of blocking a user once they exceed their request limit, throttling would slow down the processing of their requests:
For example, after 1,000 requests, the system could start processing requests more slowly, adding a small delay (throttling) between each request.
This ensures that the system is not overwhelmed by a flood of requests, but users can still continue interacting with the service.


Implementation:
Throttling is often used alongside rate limiting, especially in cases where you want to avoid the harsh experience of completely blocking users.
Monitoring and Handling Rate Limiting How can you monitor and handle users hitting rate limits?
Monitoring rate limits is crucial for ensuring the system functions smoothly and users are informed about their limits.
Monitoring User Behavior Monitoring helps administrators track which users frequently hit rate limits, identifying potential abuse or system issues.
Example: An analytics dashboard could show which users frequently exceed their rate limits and allow system admins to adjust limits as necessary.
Informing Users of Rate Limits When users hit their rate limits, it’s important to provide clear feedback about why their requests are being denied. This can improve user experience and reduce frustration.
Example: Respond to rate-limited requests with HTTP status code 429 (Too Many Requests), along with a message indicating when the user can try again.
Common Challenges and Trade-offs What are some trade-offs and challenges when implementing rate limiting?
Performance vs. Resource Protection: Striking the right balance between allowing a reasonable level of burst traffic without overwhelming the system.
Handling Spikes: Rate limiting can sometimes block legitimate traffic spikes. Using a more flexible algorithm like Token Bucket allows bursts while still enforcing overall limits.
User Experience: Harsh rate limits can frustrate users, so providing a clear message and resetting the rate limit appropriately is important.
Frequently Asked Questions What’s the difference between throttling and rate limiting?
Throttling typically refers to slowing down the response to requests rather than outright denying them. Rate limiting blocks requests entirely once a user exceeds their allowed limit.
How do you design a rate limiter for a globally distributed service?
Use a centralized store (like Redis) or consistent hashing to ensure that all nodes in the distributed system can track user request limits consistently.
How do you ensure fairness in rate limiting?
By tracking limits based on users, API tokens, or IP addresses, fairness is enforced across all users to prevent one user from monopolizing system resources.
What happens when a user exceeds their rate limit?
The system typically returns an HTTP 429 (Too Many Requests) status code, signaling that the user has exceeded their limit and should retry after a specified duration.
Conclusion Rate limiting is a critical aspect of designing robust, scalable, and secure systems. By preventing abuse, controlling traffic flow, and ensuring fair usage, rate limiting protects system resources while maintaining a smooth user experience. Implementing the right algorithm, monitoring behavior, and ensuring consistent limits across distributed systems are key to building an effective rate limiter that scales with your service.
Clap here if you liked the blog