Monolithic Architecture - Introduction

Monolithic architecture is a software design model where all components of an application—like the user interface (UI), business logic, and database—are built into a single codebase. This design approach works well for small-scale applications or Minimum Viable Products (MVPs), as it keeps things simple and integrated. However, as the application grows in complexity, with added features, increased user traffic, and more data processing, maintaining and scaling this architecture becomes difficult.

Example: E-Commerce Platform

Consider an e-commerce platform. In the beginning, the application offers basic functionality, such as browsing products and placing orders, making a monolithic structure effective. But as more features like user authentication, payment integration, inventory management, and shipping get added, the application’s complexity increases significantly.

---

Basic Structure of a Monolithic E-Commerce Application

A basic monolithic e-commerce application consists of several key layers:

1. User Interface (UI): The front-end component where users interact with the platform, enabling them to browse products, manage accounts, and place orders.
2. Business Logic: This layer processes core functionalities, including order processing, inventory management, and business rule execution.
3. Database: Responsible for storing essential data such as product details, order histories, and user accounts.

---

Increasing Complexity: Handling Orders and Payments

Now let's explore how introducing order placement and payment processing adds complexity to the application. When a user places an order, multiple systems must collaborate, including inventory checks, payment processing, and database updates.

Sequence Diagram: Order Placement

---

Challenges of Increased Complexity

As new features are added, managing the system becomes more complex. Introducing modules like user authentication, shipping services, discount calculations, and product reviews increases the system’s complexity. Each added feature requires integration, testing, and maintenance, making the overall architecture more challenging to handle and increasing the potential for technical issues.

In this representation, the Business Logic Layer handles requests from the UI and interacts with various modules responsible for different functionalities. Each module communicates with a centralized database, and some modules may also connect with external APIs.

The increasing complexity of a monolithic system brings several challenges:

1. Scaling Issues: To scale a monolithic app, the entire system needs to be duplicated, even if only certain components require more resources.
2. Deployment Risks: Any change, no matter how small, requires redeploying the entire application. This process can lead to increased downtime risks.
3. Maintenance Challenges: As the codebase grows, managing it becomes tougher. Minor changes can inadvertently affect other components, making maintenance a daunting task.
4. System Vulnerability: A failure in any module, such as the payment module, can disrupt the entire application, creating a single point of failure.
5. Development Slowdowns: Coordinating work across interconnected modules becomes complicated, often leading to longer development cycles.

---

When to Transition from a Monolithic Architecture

For smaller apps with limited features, a monolithic architecture might be sufficient. However, as the app evolves and becomes more complex, transitioning to a microservices architecture can be beneficial. Here are some key signs that it’s time to make the switch:

• Frequent updates to specific modules: If individual components require regular, independent updates, microservices allow you to modify and deploy just those components without affecting the entire system.
• Targeted scaling requirements: When only certain parts of the system need scaling, microservices enable scaling of specific services, optimizing resource usage and reducing costs.
• Difficulty in maintenance: As the codebase grows, managing it becomes cumbersome. Microservices break the app into smaller, manageable services, making maintenance easier.
• Development bottlenecks: If developers struggle to work on different features simultaneously due to tightly coupled components, microservices offer more flexibility and parallel development.

---

Challenges in Monolithic Architecture

1. Database Coupling in Monolithic Architecture

In a monolithic application, all modules typically share the same database. While this is convenient for simple applications, as the system grows, this tight coupling to the database can introduce challenges. Let's explore these issues.

Database Shared by Multiple Modules

In a monolithic e-commerce platform, modules like Order Processing, Inventory, User Management, and Shipping all use the same database. This shared access creates a tight connection between the database and the modules, which means that changes to one module can unintentionally affect others.

For instance, if you update the database schema in the Order Processing module by adding a field for discount codes, it could cause issues in the Discount Module if it’s not adjusted to accommodate the new change. This kind of dependency highlights how tightly coupled the modules and database structure are in a monolithic setup.

1. Schema Modifications: When you change the schema for one module, it can break other modules if they depend on the same tables or fields.
2. Performance Challenges: Since all modules are reading from and writing to the same database, it can create a performance bottleneck, slowing down the overall system.
3. Coupled Queries: The business logic often becomes dependent on the database schema, making it hard to change one without impacting the other.

This kind of dependency makes scaling and modifying the application difficult, which is why many businesses transition to microservices, where each service manages its own database, reducing these challenges.

---

2. Cross-Cutting Concerns in Monolithic Systems

Cross-cutting concerns are like the common rules that apply to all modules of an application but aren’t specific to any one feature. Imagine logging, security, error handling, and performance monitoring as the behind-the-scenes superheroes that keep everything running smoothly. In a monolithic app, these concerns affect every part of the codebase. As the system grows, managing these aspects consistently becomes more difficult—like trying to maintain order in a bustling kitchen where everyone’s cooking different dishes.

Main Concerns

1. Logging: Each module—be it Order, Payment, or Inventory—needs to log data for debugging and audits. If logs are scattered across modules without a central system, they can become inconsistent.
2. Security: User authentication and authorization must be applied across all modules. Without a unified approach, there’s a risk of redundant code or mismatched security checks.
3. Error Handling: Properly catching and managing errors across modules is crucial, but ensuring consistent handling can be challenging in a large monolithic codebase.

Key Aspects of Cross-Cutting Concerns

1. Inconsistent Implementation: Without centralized management, each module may handle cross-cutting concerns differently, creating inconsistencies.
2. Code Duplication: Similar logic for logging, security, or error handling may be repeated across modules, making maintenance harder.
3. Increased Complexity: As the codebase grows, managing these concerns in a tightly coupled monolithic setup adds to the overall complexity and makes debugging more time-consuming.

---

3. Scaling Challenges in Monolithic Architecture

Scaling a monolithic application is like trying to expand a house with limited space. Since all components of the system are integrated into one codebase, scaling becomes challenging and inefficient. Let's explore the two main approaches: vertical scaling and horizontal scaling.

Vertical Scaling: Pushing Limits

Vertical scaling involves boosting the capacity of the existing server by adding more CPU, RAM, or storage. Initially, this approach works well, similar to upgrading a small car to a bigger vehicle. However, as the user base grows, this approach becomes more expensive and eventually hits its physical limits.

In vertical scaling:

1. Upgraded server: The single server is replaced with a more powerful one.
2. Physical limits: Despite upgrades, server capacity reaches a point where it can't be increased further.

Horizontal Scaling: Cloning the Monolith

As traffic continues to rise, developers move to horizontal scaling, where multiple clones of the monolithic app are deployed across different servers. This approach is like adding more vehicles to handle increased traffic.

In horizontal scaling:

1. Replication of the Monolith: The entire monolithic app is replicated across multiple servers.
2. Shared Database: All instances connect to a central database, which can become a bottleneck and single point of failure.

Key Challenges in Scaling a Monolith

1. Resource Inefficiency: Whether scaling vertically or horizontally, all modules are scaled, leading to overuse of resources.
2. Database Bottlenecks: Even with multiple app instances, a single shared database can limit overall performance.
3. System Crashes: If one module crashes, it affects the entire system, making scaling less efficient.

Understanding these scaling challenges helps explain why many organizations eventually adopt microservices architecture, where individual components can scale independently based on demand.

---

4. Deployment and Testing Challenges

As the monolithic system grows, deploying updates becomes more complex. In a large application with many interdependent modules, even small changes require thorough testing across the entire system. Here’s why deployment and testing become major pain points:

Full System Testing

In a monolithic system, all modules are interdependent, meaning changes to one module can potentially break others. As a result, testing must cover the entire system. This leads to long testing cycles and increased risk of introducing bugs during deployment.

Continuous Integration (CI) Bottlenecks

In a growing monolithic system, the build and deployment process becomes time-consuming. If all code is part of the same repository, a single change in one module can trigger the CI pipeline for the entire system. This leads to longer build times, higher failure rates, and developer frustration.

Frequent Downtime During Deployment

In a monolithic architecture, deploying even small changes can require taking down the entire system temporarily, leading to downtime. As the user base grows, this downtime becomes unacceptable.

Explanation

1. Development Pipeline: Multiple developers are pushing changes into a shared CI pipeline. Since the application is monolithic, every change triggers a full build and test cycle.
2. Build Process: The entire monolithic application must be built, even for small changes. This adds time and complexity, leading to potential bottlenecks.
3. Testing Bottlenecks: Full-system testing must be done since changes in one part (e.g., the Order module) can affect other modules (e.g., Payment or UI), increasing the risk of errors and failures.
4. Deployment Process: Deployment of the monolithic system requires restarting all services, potentially leading to downtime and performance issues.
5. Post-Deployment Issues: If a bug is discovered after deployment, it often requires a full rollback, which can cause additional downtime.
6. Monolithic System: Represents various tightly coupled modules (UI, Orders, Inventory, Payment) that are all deployed and tested together.

---

Conclusion

Monolithic architectures can be effective for small, simple applications. However, as complexity grows, the drawbacks can outweigh the benefits. Issues like scalability limitations, deployment challenges, and maintenance difficulties make managing a monolithic application increasingly cumbersome. Recognizing when to transition to a microservices architecture can save time, effort, and resources, enabling a more manageable and scalable application. As your application grows, managing a monolithic architecture can become increasingly complex. In this tutorial, we’ll dive deeper into the real challenges that arise in large monolithic systems, from database coupling to cross-cutting concerns like security and logging. We’ll explore how scaling a monolithic app becomes inefficient and why deployment and testing become bottlenecks over time. Through detailed diagrams and explanations, you'll gain a better understanding of the limitations that make scaling and maintaining a monolithic system a daunting task.